Friday, 14 June 2013

Syria: US chemical weapons charges 'full of lies'

BEIRUT (AP) — The Syrian government on Friday dismissed U.S. charges that it used chemical weapons as "full of lies," accusing President Barack Obama of resorting to fabrications to justify his decision to arm Syrian rebels. The commander of the main rebel umbrella group welcomed the U.S. move, saying it would lift his fighters' morale.
The U.S. decision to begin arming the rebels, though details have not been completed, marks a deepening of U.S. involvement in Syria's two-year civil war. It comes as President Bashar Assad's forces have been scoring victories, driving rebels out of a key town near the Lebanese border and launching offensives in the center and north, targeting Aleppo, the nation's largest city.
U.S. officials said the administration could provide the rebel fighters with a range of weapons, including small arms, ammunition, assault rifles and a variety of anti-tank weaponry such as shoulder-fired rocket-propelled grenades and other missiles. However, no final decisions have been made on the type of weaponry or when it would reach the rebels, according to the officials, who insisted on anonymity in order to discuss internal administration discussions with reporters.
In addition to the increased military aid, the U.S. also announced Thursday it had conclusive evidence that Assad's regime has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale against opposition forces. The White House said multiple chemical attacks last year killed up to 150 people.
Obama has said the use of chemical weapons cross a "red line," triggering greater U.S involvement in the crisis.
"The White House has issued a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria, based on fabricated information," a statement issued Friday by the Syrian Foreign Ministry said. "The United States is using cheap tactics to justify President Barack Obama's decision to arm the Syrian opposition," it said.
The statement also accused the U.S. of "double standards," saying America claims to combat terrorism while providing support for "terrorist" groups in Syria, such as Jabhat al-Nusra, with arms and money. The group, also known as the Nusra Front, is an al-Qaida affiliate that has emerged as one of the most effective rebel factions in Syria.
The commander of the main Western-backed rebel group fighting in Syria said he hoped that U.S. weapons will be in the hands of rebels in the near future, noting it would boost the spirits of the fighters on the ground.
"We hope to have the weapons and ammunition that we need in the near future," Gen. Salim Idris told Al-Arabiya TV.
"This will surely reflect positively on the rebels' morale, which is high despite attempts by the regime, Hezbollah and Iran to show that their morale after the fall of Qusair deteriorated," he said, referring to the town near the border with Lebanon.
Loay AlMikdad, a spokesman for the Free Syrian Army, said Idris will be meeting with international players in the coming days, starting Saturday, to work out the details of what is to be delivered and how.
"We encourage them to take a decision in this relation, by establishing a no-fly zone either all over Syria or areas they choose based on their technical or military considerations on the ground," he said, to ensure safe areas for civilians.
"We hope they start arming immediately. Any delay costs blood of Syrians. It is not water, it is blood of the Syrians, women and children and its future."
AlMikdad said the rebels have asked for shoulder propelled rockets, thermal anti-tank missiles, anti-aircrafts missiles, surface to surface missiles and armored vehicles.
Assad's forces, aided by fighters from Lebanon's militant group Hezbollah, captured Qusair on June 5, dealing a heavy blow to rebels who had been entrenched in the strategic town for over a year.
Since then, the regime has shifted its attention to recapture other areas in the central Homs province and Aleppo to the north.
The regime's advances have added urgency to U.S. discussions on whether to provide the rebels with weapons.
The decision came a day after the United Nations said nearly 93,000 people have been confirmed dead in Syria's civil war, but the actual number is believed to be much higher.
Russia, a staunch ally of Assad, on Friday disputed the U.S. charge that Syria used chemical weapons against the rebels.
President Vladimir Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters that the information provided by U.S. officials to Russia "didn't look convincing."
Asked if Russia could retaliate to the U.S. move to supply weapons to the Syrian rebels by delivering the S-300 air defense missile systems to the regime, Ushakov said "there is no talk about it yet."
"We aren't competing over Syria, we are trying to settle the issue in a constructive way," he said.
Alexey Pushkov, chairman of Russia's parliamentary foreign affairs committee, wrote on his Twitter account Friday that "the data on Assad's use of chemical weapons were faked in the same place as the lie about (Saddam) Hussein's weapons of mass destruction," referring to the deposed Iraqi dictator.
"Obama is going down the route of G. Bush," he added, in reference to former President George W. Bush's assertion — never proven, but used to justify the invasion of Iraq — that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.
The Russian comments were echoed by a lawmaker in Damascus.
"This reminds us of what America did in the prelude to the invasion of Iraq by releasing fabrications and lies to the international community that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction," said Issam Khalil, a member of Assad's Baath party.
Obama's deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, said Obama was planning to step up military assistance to Syrian rebels.
Ushakov warned that providing such assistance could derail efforts to convene a Syria peace conference. The main opposition coalition has already said it would not attend, all but scuttling the initiative.
In Friday's violence, Syrian troops and rebels fought some of the heaviest battles in months in Aleppo, Syria's largest city, activists said.
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the clashes were concentrated in the city's eastern rebel-held neighborhood of Sakhour, calling the fighting "the most violent in months." It said regime troops attacked the neighborhood from two directions but failed to advance, suffering casualties.
The fight for Aleppo, a city of 3 million that was once a bastion of support for Assad, is critical for both the regime and the opposition. If it were to fall completely into opposition hands, the rebels would score a major victory and acquire a stronghold in the north near the Turkish border. A rebel defeat would buy Assad more time, at the very least, and even possibly turn the tide of the civil war against the opposition

Thursday, 6 June 2013

First the military, now the diplomacy

Pyongyang has agreed to hold official talks with Seoul over the re-opening of a joint industrial zone. North Korea expert Eric Ballbach believes the communist regime has good reasons for making this move now.
DW: The industrial park Kaesong has been closed for over two months now. Now Pyongyang has offered talks with Seoul about opening the park back up. Was this a surprising gesture?
Eric Ballbach: I wasn't surprised by it. A long-term closure does not seem likely. For one, it is a profitable project for both North and South Korea, though for the South, it does not make that much of a difference compared to the rest of its foreign trade. But there are over 120 small and medium-sized South Korean companies that produce their products there.
Economic growth will legitimize the North Korean government's power. They started out by placing emphasis on building up their military and have achieved this with their latest rocket launch and nuclear test, which also got the military behind the new leadership. Nonetheless, it is surely the case that it is even more important for Kim Jong Un and his leadership to develop the economy than it was for his father and grandfather before him. So that needs to be taken into account regarding the recent developments, i.e. the visit to China, talks with Japan, and now these positive signs being sent to South Korea.
I think there are basically two political styles in North Korea. The one focuses on autonomy - the one we have seen of late. And now the leadership is switching over to an influence-maximizing kind of politics. North Korea wants to have some say in its own development and will most likely now focus on economic issues.
How harmful has the closure of Kaesong been to North Korea's economy?
Comprehensive cooperation with the South is a real dilemma for the North. There has always been the risk that this could destabilize the regime. Since 2008 / 2009 and especially after the sinking of the South Korean corvette "Cheonan" in 2010, one could see that economic trans-Korean cooperation outside of Kaesong decreased. North Korea has been able to compensate for that by strengthening ties with China. For Pyongyang that is less of a danger, but it will not be enough on its own. As long as the regime does not see Kaesong as a danger to the regime, it will surely continue to exist.
For the South Koreans, Kaesong is a special organizational structure, because there are a number of different parties involved. Hyundai is a large investor, there are the 123 firms including insurance companies. Different interests have developed from these different kinds of companies, which put pressure on the government to resume production as soon as possible. So when it comes to Kaesong, two complementary strategies - North and South - come together.
Is it clear how much money has been lost since the closure of Kaesong?
That is not really clear because it is not certain whether the companies at Kaesong have had to continue paying rent for the facilities during the last two months or not. The information on that varies. The loss has certainly been noticeable. But for North Korea, the 53,000 unemployed people are more important than the financial loss. Many North Koreans were employed by the South Korean companies at the industrial park, some of them were brought from far away to work at Kaesong. Initially that was a precarious issue for Pyongyang: How does a region which has weak structures in place to begin with, deal with 53,000 suddenly unemployed people? It is a dangerous situation and I think that the regime saw it as a bigger threat than continued cooperation with the South.
In addition to economic issues, it is said the talks will also be about resuming family gatherings between North and South Koreans, something that has been put on hold for the past five years.
Exactly. That was the surprising bit. But it is obvious that the North wants to win back some support from the South. And the humanitarian aspect is something that North Korea's new leadership under President Park Geun-hye has been emphasizing. Park announced an idea to separate humanitarian from political issues; to give humanitarian aid, even if political security issues remain uncertain.
That is the biggest difference compared to the previous administration under Lee Myung-bak, which put the nuclear issue ahead of humanitarian ones. But now the question will surely be to what extent Seoul will insist on an apology for the sinking of the "Cheonan" and the shelling of the South Korean island Yeonpyeong at the end of 2010. The question how South Korea wants to define itself will also be pivotal. Will it see itself as a party that can play a key role in solving the nuclear issue and accordingly place this above trans-Korean ties?
If this were the case, it would also be difficult because Pyongyang sees the issue as a bilateral issue with the US and only allows Seoul a limited amount of influence. So that will be another important question: whether and to what extent the new South Korean administration will be willing to promote North-South ties should Pyongyang not agree to a complete denuclearization. And I think it is improbable that North Korea will completely scrap its nuclear program. If it did, it would be putting an end to Kim Jong Il's "historic legacy."

Britain to pay for colonial-era torture, denies liability

(Reuters) - Britain expressed regret on Thursday for the abuse of Kenyans by colonial forces during the 1950s Mau Mau insurgency and announced compensation for 5,228 survivors, but stopped short of apologizing.
The deal, settled out of court after three elderly Kenyan torture victims won the right in October to sue the British government, could encourage people in other former colonies to press claims over grievances dating back to the days of Empire.
"The British government recognizes that Kenyans were subject to torture and other forms of ill treatment at the hands of the colonial administration," Foreign Secretary William Hague told parliament.
"The British government sincerely regrets that these abuses took place."
The 5,228 claimants are due to receive 13.9 million pounds ($21.4 million), about 2,600 pounds each, or about 340,000 Kenyan shillings in a country where average annual income is some 70,000 shillings.
Lawyers representing the veterans will separately receive six million pounds in fees for years of work on the case.
London will also pay for a new memorial in Nairobi to the victims of torture and ill-treatment during the colonial era.
A British diplomat said Hague stopped short of offering a formal apology because that could be interpreted as the government accepting responsibility, which would have had legal implications.
Mau Mau veterans danced, prayed and ululated to celebrate news of the agreement at an event in Nairobi.
"This is confirmation we were freedom fighters and not terrorists. We have been waiting a long time to hear the British say 'what we did in Kenya was wrong'," said Gitu Wa Kahengeri, secretary general of the Mau Mau War Veterans Association.
He said the compensation was "not enough" but the veterans accepted the offer as they feared Britain could prolong the court battle for years, by which point it would be too late because some of the elderly men and women could be dead.
"Where will we be in 30 years?" Kahengeri asked around 100 veterans gathered in Nairobi. "A bird in the hand is better than 10 in the bush."
"NOT A PRECEDENT"
The so-called Kenyan Emergency of 1952-1961 was one of the most violent episodes of British colonial rule in Africa.
Mau Mau rebels fighting for land and an end to British domination attacked British targets, causing panic among white settlers and alarming the government in London.
Tens of thousands of rebels were killed by colonial forces and their Kenyan allies, while an estimated 150,000 people, many of them unconnected to the Mau Mau, were detained in camps.
The compensation package is likely to be examined closely by others who complain of human rights abuses during British colonial times, although Hague said he believed it would not give extra force to their claims.
"We do not believe that this settlement establishes a precedent in relation to any other former colonial administration," he said.
Claims concerning the conduct of the British in Malaysia and Cyprus have already emerged, and diplomats said they expected more to come, which would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
The three Kenyans who took the British government to court were all survivors of the Emergency detention camps.
The British government tried for three years to block the legal action by Paulo Nzili, Wambugu Wa Nyingi and Jane Muthoni Mara, now in their 70s and 80s, but the High Court ruled in October that they had the right to sue for damages.
Nzili was castrated while in detention, Nyingi suffered severe beatings during the nine years for which he was held without charge, and Mara suffered sexual abuse including rape using a soda bottle full of boiling water.
"This is a story of a massive cover-up and 50 years later justice being done. I don't know if there will be another case like this," said Harvard professor Caroline Elkins, whose book 'Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya' served as the basis for the case.
In 2008, The Times newspaper reported that U.S. President Barack Obama's Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, had been imprisoned and tortured by the British during the Mau Mau uprising. It quoted his wife, Sarah Onyango, as saying he was whipped every day.
The report fueled speculation that Obama might have a cool relationship with Britain because of this, although a later biography of the president cast doubt on the account.
(Additional reporting by Richard Lough in Nairobi; editing by James Macharia and Andrew Roche)

Saturday, 1 June 2013

Follow Reuters Facebook Twitter RSS YouTube Recommended Video Amateur video reveals power of Oklahoma twister Play Video Amateur video reveals power of Oklahoma twister FACTBOX: U.S. jets struggle to evade Chinese hackers Play Video FACTBOX: U.S. jets struggle to evade Chinese hackers Lesbian love story wins Palme D'or Play Video Lesbian love story wins Palme D'or How Small Businesses Owners Have Pursued New Opportunities How Small Businesses Owners Have Pursued New… (The Huffington Post) Study Reveals Breast Milk Contains More Than 700 Types of Bacteria Study Reveals Breast Milk Contains More Than 700 Types… (Juno Lucina) Amateur video reveals power of Oklahoma twister Play Video FACTBOX: U.S. jets struggle to evade Chinese hackers Play Video Lesbian love story wins Palme D'or Play Video How Small Businesses Owners Have Pursued New Opportunities Study Reveals Breast Milk Contains More Than 700 Types of Bacteria [?] Read Iran presidential debate on economy dissolves into chaos 31 May 2013 1 Five killed in Oklahoma tornadoes, storms move northeast | Video 3:20am EDT 2 Turkish PM calls for immediate end to protests as clashes flare | Video 7:25am EDT 3 Oprah must face lawsuit over 'Own Your Power': appeals court 31 May 2013 4 Assad forces advance; West, Russia exchange barbs ahead of talks | Video 31 May 2013 5 Discussed 152 Will immigration reform get killed in Republican-led U.S. House? 102 Will immigration reform get killed in Republican-led House? 83 Senator McCain met with rebels in Syria on Monday: spokesman Pictures Photo Reuters Photojournalism Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption Photo Spellbound Highlights from the annual national spelling competition that lead to Arvind Mahankali's win. Slideshow Photo Getting to work Commuting scenes from around the world. Slideshow Sponsored Links Image Ad Discover a brand new way to think about used cars. Image Ad Get multiple auto insurance quotes in your area. Save Big on Car Insurance! Ads by Marchex 'After Earth' leaves critics cold ahead of competitive weekend

Actor Will Smith and his son Jaden Smith arrive for the premiere of their film ''After Earth'' in New York May 29, 2013. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri
LOS ANGELES | Fri May 31, 2013 6:33pm EDT
(Reuters) - Will Smith may be one of Hollywood's most bankable action stars, but his new film, "After Earth," in which he stars with his 14-year-old son Jaden, has opened to cold reviews from critics and faces stiff competition in a busy box office weekend.
"After Earth" is a futuristic post-apocalyptic tale of a father and his teenage son in which the young boy must embark on a life-saving mission.
Sony Pictures Entertainment, a division of Sony Corp., spent about $130 million to produce the movie, making it one of the studio's biggest summer releases.
The story is centered on the father-son relationship and the dynamic of a father passing the mantle to his son is mirrored both on screen and off, as the younger Smith leads the action.
Will Smith, 44, who wrote the initial story and was the executive producer of the film, said the project gave him valuable time to spend with his son, with whom he first starred in the 2006 family drama, "The Pursuit of Happyness."
"Filmmaking and entertainment is our family business," Smith said at a recent news conference. "So, it really gave us an opportunity for the last year to spend ten or twelve hours a day together, every day. And for me it's just the best way, for me at least, to parent."
Jaden Smith bears a strong resemblance to his famous father and won over most critics as the lead in 2010's reboot of "The Karate Kid." However, he has not been received as warmly for his performance as ranger Kitai Raige in "After Earth."
NEGATIVE REVIEWS
Variety's Scott Foundas said both father and son failed to meet expectations. "Senior Smith gives one of the least substantive performances of his career, while the undeniably charismatic Jaden toggles between ... paralyzing fear and simmering rage."
Manohla Dargis wrote in the New York Times that the younger Smith was "a pretty teenager with jumpy eyebrows whose character remains an insufferable brat."
Rolling Stone's Peter Travers slammed the script as "an unholy mess of platitudes and posturing." He gave the film one out of five stars, saying "It's not a good sign when you sit there thinking one thing - Make. It. Stop."
"After Earth" scored just 32 out of 100 on Metacritic.com, which compiles ratings based on critics' reviews. Only 13 percent of critics recommended the movie in reviews collected on the Rotten Tomatoes website.
This is despite the fact that the film was directed by M. Night Shayamalan, who scored a huge hit with the 1999 suspense drama "The Sixth Sense," which grossed more than $672 million at the worldwide box office. Shayamalan was less successful though with 2006's "Lady in the Water" and 2010's "The Last Airbender."
Box office forecasters predict "After Earth" will make $35- $40 million in U.S. and Canadian ticket sales from Friday through Sunday.
The film opened on Thursday and took in $1 million at U.S. and Canadian theaters, behind Lions Gate Entertainment's comedy heist caper "Now You See Me," which earned $1.5 million.
"After Earth" faces tough competition this weekend from recent releases still drawing big business, such as car-chase sequel "Fast & Furious 6," superhero tale "Iron Man 3," and sci-fi film "Star Trek Into Darkness."
"It's not an enviable task opening up this weekend," said Phil Contrino, chief analyst with Boxoffice.com. International sales will be critical, he said, since Will Smith remains a big draw for overseas audiences.
Sony Pictures spokesman Steve Elzer said a weekend take of about $30 million in the United States and Canada would be a solid number for a movie that is not a branded sequel.
Sony's other upcoming summer films include action thriller "White House Down," sci-fi adventure "Elysium," and book adaptation "The Moral Instruments: City of Bones."